Amaravati - Anantapur Greenfield Expressway

NHAI

Expressway
Amaravati - Anantapur Greenfield Expressway map

Overview

The Amaravati Anantapur Greenfield Expressway is a proposed 384-km spinal corridor (six-lane, access-controlled), with two feeder expressways - Kurnool (123.7 km) and Kadapa (104.05 km) - bringing the total network to approximately 612 km in Andhra Pradesh, initially sanctioned by Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) under NHAI's Bharatmala Pariyojana to link Amaravati capital with Anantapur through Guntur, Prakasam, Kadapa, and Kurnool districts. Estimated cost stands at Rs 27,635 crore, with the AP state government committing to bear 50% of land acquisition costs. The project was active under TDP (2016-2019), effectively halted under YSRCP (2019-2024), and partially replaced by the Bengaluru-Vijayawada Expressway. This Premium layer maps the original alignment so buyers can assess corridor exposure before purchasing near the route.

No Active NHAI Notification: The Core Risk for Amaravati Anantapur Greenfield Expressway Land Near the Proposed Alignment

This expressway carries a unique risk that neither a greenfield acquisition notice nor a formal NHAI gazette cancellation has been issued for the original alignment. The project existed in active preparation under TDP (2016-2019): Rs 2,200 crore was allocated for land acquisition, alignment marking was completed across five districts, and MoRTH had approved the initial 4-lane design with provision for 8-lane expansion. Then YSRCP came to power in 2019 and effectively replaced this corridor with the Bengaluru-Vijayawada Expressway (National Highway 544G (NH-544G)), realigning the route via Pulivendula and Chilakaluripet junction on NH-16, saving Rs 3,500 crore and 741 hectares of land.

The Bengaluru-Vijayawada Expressway (NH-544G) already has all 14 construction packages awarded (March 2023) and its foundation stone was laid by the Prime Minister in March 2024. That project is actively under construction. The original Amaravati-Anantapur corridor has no new DPR, no current NHAI notification, and no active land acquisition since 2019.

The table below shows the project's timeline and what each phase means for buyers today:

MoRTH approval; alignment finalized

Period

2016-2018

Status

Completed

Buyer Impact

Original corridor marked

Land acquisition allocated (Rs 2,200 crore)

Period

2018-2019

Status

Partially executed; halted

Buyer Impact

Some marking done; no gazette notification finalised

YSRCP replaces with Bengaluru-Vijayawada route

Period

2019-2024

Status

NH-544G now under construction

Buyer Impact

Original Amaravati-Anantapur alignment no longer active

TDP returns to power

Period

2024-present

Status

No new DPR or notification issued

Buyer Impact

Corridor uncertain; do not price as active acquisition zone

Any plot being marketed as "expressway-adjacent" along the original Amaravati-Anantapur alignment in Kadapa, Kurnool, or Anantapur districts is being sold against an alignment that has no current legal force. If TDP revives this project, fresh land acquisition notifications will be issued; buying based on the original 2018 marking without a current notification is speculation, not informed investing.

Maruru to Pedaparimi: Which Districts Along the Amaravati Anantapur Expressway Route Hold Structural Land Value

The original spinal corridor starts from NH-44 near Maruru in Anantapur district and terminates at Pedaparimi near Sakhamuru, crossing Vijayawada's Inner Ring Road (IRR) near Tadikonda and Outer Ring Road (ORR) near Velavarthipadu. Two feeder expressways were also planned: a 123.7-km Kurnool Feeder and a 104.05-km Kadapa Feeder. Neither feeder has an active DPR today.

The table below shows the key districts and nodes along the proposed alignment with the current land signal at each:

Anantapur (Maruru area)

Role in Alignment

NH-44 start of spinal corridor

Land Signal

Base entry point; Rayalaseema connectivity

Key Risk

No active notification; long-horizon only

Kurnool

Role in Alignment

Feeder expressway junction (123.7 km feeder)

Land Signal

Regional connectivity gain; industrial interest

Key Risk

Feeder has no active DPR

Kadapa

Role in Alignment

Feeder expressway junction (104.05 km feeder)

Land Signal

Links Rayalaseema to corridor

Key Risk

Feeder has no active DPR

Prakasam / Chilakaluripet

Role in Alignment

Modified NH-16 junction; existing connectivity

Land Signal

NH-544G (Bengaluru-Vijayawada) already benefits this zone

Key Risk

NH-544G land acquisition already underway here

Pedaparimi / Sakhamuru (Amaravati end)

Role in Alignment

Corridor terminus near Amaravati CRDA zone

Land Signal

Capital city adjacency; strong CRDA demand

Key Risk

Amaravati CRDA zone value is independent of this expressway

Chilakaluripet and Prakasam district are the most misread corridors from this alignment. These areas are already benefiting from the active Bengaluru-Vijayawada Expressway (NH-544G), not from the Amaravati-Anantapur proposal. Land near Chilakaluripet has real infrastructure upside but from NH-544G, which is funded, contracted, and under construction. Do not price it against the Amaravati-Anantapur alignment, which has no current legal status. The Amaravati end of the corridor (Pedaparimi, Sakhamuru) gets its value from CRDA capital region development, not from this expressway.

Data Source & Verification

Source

Official National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) documents

Official Website

www.nhai.gov.in

Coordinate Reference System

EPSG:4326 (WGS 84)

Geometry Type

LineString / MultiLineString

Data Format

Vector (GeoJSON) + Raster Tiles

Last Verified

May 2026

Status

Proposed (no active NHAI notification)

Disclaimer: Alignment and corridor information shown here is indicative. Users should verify details with National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and the relevant state authorities before any transaction or investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore Andhra Pradesh on Map

Verified Lands for sale, Layers & Tools on one single map.

Go to Map

Was this layer helpful?

Anything wrong, outdated, or missing — we want to hear it.